troubled diva  
 

 

Friday, December 14, 2001

Single Sentences: 15

K's Christmas present: greater love hath no man than this.
(Don't worry, he doesn't read this blog)

· link to this ·

Single Sentences: 14

I heard some great (recent, first-hand) gossip about Jason Donovan last night – but I’m not going to repeat it (I’m not Popbitch, and he’d probably sue me or something, and that’s a fairly major clue as to what sort of gossip it was).

· link to this ·

Single Sentences: 13

Can't believe that tonight's the last episode (for now) of Jack And Karen - God, I'll miss them.

· link to this ·

Single Sentences: 12

I don't know why boring people always assume I'm such a good listener (probably because I'm a little too good at the whole smiling and nodding thing); half the time, I'm miles away.

· link to this ·

Single Sentences: 11

Please, please, stop me from getting pissed up and dancing like a twat at tonight's office party; a little dignity would be nice...

· link to this ·

Single Sentences: 10

This afternoon's soundtrack: Shuggie Otis (every bit as good as it's cracked up to be).

· link to this ·

Single Sentences: 9

= ?

· link to this ·

Single Sentences: 8

These are the guys we'll be staying with on Christmas day. This is also the first test of my dircon web space, which I've never bothered using before.

· link to this ·

Single Sentences: 7

So, what are you up to this weekend?

· link to this ·

Single Sentences: 6

The Prize Turnip: Spiked tells it like it is (thanks Buni).

· link to this ·

Single Sentences: 5

Sometimes, Nurofen is not enough - ouch.

· link to this ·

Single Sentences: 4

If you accidentally spill my beer all over me, then you should have the common decency to buy me another, rather than running off and hiding in a corner.

· link to this ·

Single Sentences: 3

This morning's soundtrack: The Gotan Project.

· link to this ·

Single Sentences: 2

As our new video player can cope with the US format, I can now place an order for Smashing Time, a film which I have longed to see again for the past 25 years or so; this is very exciting.

· link to this ·

Single Sentences: 1

Due to my hideous hangover, I shall be restricting today's postings to single sentences.

· link to this ·

Thursday, December 13, 2001

Herbert's Bodily Functions.

So, further to today’s earlier posting, I did go out and buy one of the CDs concerned: Herbert's Bodily Functions. And stone me, I think we might have something of a masterpiece on our hands here!

I bought Matthew Herbert's previous album Around The House back in 1998, on the recommendation of Charles Webster (who, recording under the name of Presence, brought out the superb All Systems Gone album in 1999). I wasn't convinced by it - clever stuff, but for me a somewhat weedy, anaemic take on the “deep house” genre. Then last year, he brought out Mistakes, a scary, abrasive, mental technoid 12" with one mix (the Housey Housey version) which really stuck with me over a number of months.

Bodily Functions picks up where Around The House left off, but this time the sound is richer, more fully worked, and pulsating with humanity and warmth. His singer, Dani Siciliano, comes more into her own with these songs, with a smooth, elegant, restrained vocal delivery. The music itself is scintillating stuff. It’s less housey, and more jazzy, without ever descending into pointless tasteful noodling.

Matthew Herbert has constructed most of the tracks using a self-penned manifesto which he calls PCCOM. You have to admire his refusal to follow the usual short-cuts employed by most makers of “dance” music. The manifesto is on his website at www.magicandaccident.com, but I thought it worth reproducing here.
PERSONAL CONTRACT FOR THE COMPOSITION OF MUSIC
[INCORPORATING THE MANIFESTO OF MISTAKES]
THIS IS WRITTEN FOR THE PURPOSE, NECESSITY AND DESIRE TO BE ORIGINAL AT ALL TIMES.

1. The use of sounds that exist already is not allowed. Subject to article 2. In particular:
A. No drum machines.
B. All keyboard sounds must be edited in some way: no factory presets or pre-programmed patches are allowed.

2. Only sounds that are generated at the start of the compositional process or taken from the artist's own previously unused archive are available for sampling. The use of, ordering and manipulation of noise-sound is to be held as the highest priority in composition.

3. The sampling of other people's music is strictly forbidden.

4. With the exception of the human voice, no replication of traditional acoustic instruments is allowed where the financial and physical possibility of using the real ones exists.

5. The inclusion, development, propagation, existence, replication, acknowledgement, rights, patterns and beauty of what are commonly known as accidents, is encouraged. Furthermore, they have equal rights within the composition as deliberate, conscious, or premeditated compositional actions or decisions.

6. The mixing desk is not to be reset before the start of a new track. This is for the specific purpose of applying a random eq and fx setting across the new sounds. Once the ordering and recording of the music has begun, the desk may be used as normal.

7. All fx settings must be edited: no factory preset or pre-programmed patches are allowed.

8. Samples themselves are not to be truncated from the rear.

9. A notation of every sound used and its source to be taken and published within one year at magicandaccident.com.

10. A full description of all technical equipment used on each track to be published within one year at matthewherbert.com.

11. All samples will be deleted upon completion of the track.

12. Remixes must be completed using only the sounds provided by the original artist including any packaging the media was provided in.

13. MATTHEW HERBERT 27-11-00

· link to this ·

Dymbel's joke.

And, to conclude Dymbel's day as guest editor (and breaking my No Jokes rule in the process) :
Hunting in the South

A couple of hunters are out in the woods in the deep south when one of
them falls to the ground. He doesn't seem to be breathing, and his eyes
are rolled back in his head.

The other guy whips out his cell phone and calls 911. He gasps to the
operator, "My friend is dead! What can I do?"

The operator, in a calm and soothing voice, says, "Alright, take it easy.
I can help. First, let's make sure he's dead."

There is silence, and then a gun shot is heard.

The hunter comes back on the line. "OK. Now what??"

· link to this ·

No-style style.

More from today's guest content editor: Best-Selling Authors Are Richer Than Ever. So Why Is Prose From These Pros So Poor? An excoriation (this week's new word!) of the prevalent "No-Style" style of contemporary fiction. You guys have been rumbled, big time!

· link to this ·

Let the list making commence!

I might appoint Dymbel as my content editor for the rest of today. Thanks to him once again for this link to a great set of "best albums of the year" lists. Some of the attached commentaries have actually made me want to go out and buy the CDs concerned, and you can't say fairer than that.

· link to this ·

One for the vinyl junkies.

Thanks to Dymbel (and Mir) for forwarding this Usenet posting. It's a bit specialist, but really jolly interesting if you're a vinyl afficianado.
I've just digitised a 1978 LP and was interested to find the 19 tracks covered 57-58 minutes. Side 1 goes to within 10mm of the label; side 2 is 18 mm. Given than most LPs are about 42 minutes, have we been being shortchanged? How much can fit on an LP?

B Morey
Melbourne


Hi Bernard,

Short answer: It depends. Nominally 12 minutes per side for dance music,
22 for rock & pop, and 26 for classical.

Long answer:

The louder the record is, and the more bass it has, the more the cutting
stylus moves from side to side. The greater the difference between the
channels on a stereo record and the rougher the conditions the record's
going to be played in, the deeper the cutting stylus digs in. Grooves have
to be spaced taking into account both lateral and vertical motions so that
they don't collide and cause the record to skip.

With a typical pop/rock record, the groove will be 2.5 mils (thousands of
an inch) wide, and will move from side to side a total of 2.5 mils. This
calls for a groove pitch of 200 lines per inch. Multiply this by the
amount of space available on the disc surface (3 1/3 inches) and divide by
the speed (33 1/3 rpm) to get the playing time (20 minutes).

Dance records are cut 6 dB louder, so the groove moves twice as far - 5
mils. Since it's going to be played in a club setting with lots of
vibrations and DJ backcueing, it's deeper too - typically 4 mils. Thus a
groove pitch of 111 lpi, and a playing time of just over 11 minutes.

During quiet sections the groove doesn't move nearly as much, so most
modern cutting lathes use an advance tape head or digital delay to preview
the music and bring the grooves closer together (and in some cases reduce
the depth) in order to conserve the space. The most recent ones use
computers to determine the most efficient use of space, and each groove
actually nestles into the space left in the previous one.

That being said, variable groove pitch has little application when the
music is the same volume from start to finish. This is why there is only
about thirty seconds of extra time gained when cutting dance material, and
one or two minutes for a full-length pop side. Classical, on the other
hand, can have long pianissmo (sp) sections that are perfectly suited for
this, which is why they can approach 30 minutes and still hit full volume
on during crescendos.


The other options to make a longer side are to (a) cut a shallower groove,
(b) reduce the bass, or (c) reduce the volume.

Option A means there's less space for difference between stereo channels,
to the point of the record becoming completely mono. A case in point is
Smashing Pumpkins' "Adore", which is probably the last major-label mono LP
ever produced. Record 1 is 27 minutes per side, and full volume bass-heavy
almost all the time. This was accomplished by reducing the groove to 1.5
mils width. That's flirting with disaster - any less than that and most
cartridges would slide right across the record after the first drumbeat.

Options B and C are more often used, especially on K-Tel and other
"Greatest Hits" stuff. The longest record I have is a Creation Records
compilation on which Side B plays for exactly 36 minutes. The recording
level is down 12 dB, which is to say it's only 1/4 as loud as a regular
record. (Or the surface noise is 4 times as bad, to look at it another
way.)

Combining all three options with variable pitch can give incredibly long
running times. Two known examples are an uncut performance of The Mikado
on Everest Records (44 minutes per side), and "Radio Shack Presents 90
Minutes With Arthur Fiedler" (45 minutes per side).

And although you didn't ask, these are also applicable to 45 rpm records
as well. "Hey Jude" or "MacArthur Park" are classic examples (7:15 per
side equals about 290 lpi, equivalent to a 29 minute LP). I've seen a
promo for Stairway To Heaven (7:55, 316 lpi), and Tim Neely has said that
a 45 of Guns'N'Roses "November Rain" exists - yes, the whole song! (8:55,
356 lpi!)

I hope this has been informative. It went on a lot longer than I expected
- sort of like a K-Tel record.

- Dan Howlett

· link to this ·

Prize Turnips: the debate continues.

I like this comment in particular.
I can understand the modern art idea that art is defined by intention rather than skill. However Creed has gone further with his statement that he has no idea what his work means. So now the viewing public must also project what meaning they can think of onto the object. Art without skill is one thing, but art without ideas is pushing it.
Alastair Somerville, UK

· link to this ·

Wednesday, December 12, 2001

Hip To You.

Hey, this is a good new blog. Only been going a couple of weeks so far, but I like it a lot already. She is clearly une tres stylish fille.

Nice to stumble upon an interesting, well-written blog that isn't part of the Swish Cottage / Brainsluice / Blogadoon / Over Your Head pop quizzing cabal for once....!

· link to this ·

Go on, turn it off!
Don't worry - it's just a full screen pop-up.

· link to this ·

General shout out.

Are there any other Nottingham or East Midlands bloggers out there? Or are Buni and I the only ones? I'm just curious, that's all.

Hang on, let's make this search engine friendly. Sorry, this is going to be a bit boring.

Nottingham weblog Nottingham weblogs Nottingham blog Nottingham blogger Nottingham bloggers Nottingham blogging Nottingham blogspot. East Midlands weblog East Midlands weblogs East Midlands blog East Midlands blogger East Midlands bloggers East Midlands blogging East Midlands blogspot.

Anybody out there, leave a comment or an e-mail.

· link to this ·

Hmm...

Only 12.5 out of 20 this week. Could do better.

· link to this ·

Ally moment.

Louis & The Hamiltons will be tonight’s video treat, as we ended up having something of an Ally McBeal Moment last night. One of Nottingham’s big law firms threw its Christmas party in a huge bar in a converted church, which they’d done up for the night – very effectively, with swathes of crimson and gold, and huge stars suspended over the nave. We had a gospel choir followed by an Elvis impersonator, both performing on a long walkway, perched way above the heads of the several hundred guests. It was all rather glamorous, actually. Well, we don’t get out as much as we used to…

· link to this ·

Road testing.

I’m road testing the first draft of the “2001 – The Year In Song” CDs this morning. Not bad – especially the perfect beat-mix between Felix Da Housecat and Kylie – but that Röyksopp remix of Kings Of Convenience doesn’t belong between “Bootylicious” and Playgroup’s “Number One” – think I’ll stick it nearer the beginning with the other chill-out stuff. And is the Playgroup track really strong enough to be included? Maybe I’ll put back one of the cheesy pop tunes instead – there’s room for a touch more crass vulgarity, I think.

Decisions, decisions.

· link to this ·

Tuesday, December 11, 2001

When Louis Met The Hamiltons.

At last! It's on tonight! I can scarcely contain my excitement. To keep you going until then, take a look here, here and here.

· link to this ·

The Turnip Prize (*)

Oh, was I supposed to react?

A few years ago, I saw a show at the Whitechapel Gallery. One of the exhibits consisted simply of a couple of Post-It notes stuck to each other, hanging from the ceiling by a thread, a little bit below eye level. I think that some numbers might have been scribbled on the Post-It notes.

Very unusually for me (for when it comes to conceptual art, I am a tolerant soul), the work filled me with a sudden and intense annoyance, verging on anger. I had a strong urge to grab the Post-Its, scrunch them up and chuck them on the floor. Not that I did anything of the sort of course – my mother brought me up proper.

Several years later, this is the only exhibit from that day which I can still remember. The artist must surely have been this year’s Prize Turnip, Martin Creed.

I am very surprised that he won. Actually, I think Madonna looked quite surprised that he’d won. Come to think of it, Martin Creed looked quite surprised that he’d won. I don’t think he deserved to win, but then again, I didn’t think much of any of these year’s finalists.

OK, Richard Billingham’s stuff I quite like. Quite like. Those new landscapes look quite pretty, as well. Isaac Julien: I shall never be able to forgive him for that frightful, pretentious little film “Looking For Langston” that got screened on C4’s “Out On Tuesday” in the late 80s. Also, this is the man who gave us “Young Soul Rebels” in the early 90s – neat concept, great soundtrack, lame film. Sorry, haven’t really got anything to say about the fourth guy.

But…Martin Creed? It’s Peter Sellers in “Being There” all over again, innit.

(*) Thanks, Buni!

· link to this ·

No, I've made up my mind now. It's a crap poem. Particularly that bit about the Apple Mac (why an Apple Mac?) still quoting the Dow Jones. A laboured image, and surely a technical impossibility under the circumstances?

Bloodless. That's the word I was looking for.

· link to this ·

OK, so maybe I was being a little harsh. Simon Armitage's poem isn't that bad. But then again, it's not really that good, either.

· link to this ·

Three months on.

As it’s now three months to the day since September 11, they had some poet on the radio this morning, reading some commemorative verses what he wrote specially, like. Apparently, his last big gig was a poem written in honour of the Millennium Dome, which maybe gives you a hint of the quality on offer this morning.

Midway through his dreary doggerel (EJ Thribb could have done a better job), I started making up my own lines to fit (“As I gaze up to the azure sky / I have but just one question: why?”). K and I got a bit giggly over it.

Then I opened the newspaper and found four pages of obituaries for some of those who perished in the World Trade Centre disaster. It turns out that the New York Times has been running these on a daily basis, and will continue to do so until they’ve covered everyone involved.

Not only did this wipe the smirk right off my face, but for some reason I found these short obituaries more moving than anything else I’ve seen or read about the disaster so far (even in the first few days, when the predominant emotion was shock). Maybe because it finally captured for me the true human dimension in all of this. Or maybe it’s just because I’m often at my most sentimental at breakfast time. Whatever.

Anyway, if you feel like committing an act of remembrance today: sod the bad poetry – read this instead. (You might have to register on the site first, but it’s a fairly painless exercise.)

· link to this ·

Monday, December 10, 2001

· link to this ·

It’s funny how a series of similar events in a short space of time can shape your perception. Recently, several things have happened which have brought home to me just how badly gay men can behave with each another. There’s a particular brew of self-obsession (chasing the pleasure principle at all costs, under the guise of “personal freedom”) and an unthinking cruelty which seems to exist more in the gay world than anywhere else. Community? Community my arse!

It’s almost enough to warrant a splenetic, Burchill-esque diatribe against contemporary gay social mores - full of sweeping generalisations and gleeful scatter-shot vitriol. Which would be a lot of fun, I grant you, but I shall resist temptation (for now).

Instead, I shall direct you here instead. I found it rather poignant.

· link to this ·

Sunday, December 09, 2001

Good God. I've just had a look at my personal Amazon recommendations ("we think you'll like these items").

Geri Halliwell: It's Raining Men
Steps: Chain Reaction
An album by Modern Talking
The Wizard Of Oz - DVD
Delia's How To Cook Book 3

How little they know!

· link to this ·

Yes – Magnification Tour – Nottingham Royal Centre, Saturday December 8, 2001.

Jon Anderson: “I was interviewed one time by this Finnish lady who said to me (adopts accent) ‘I listened to your music all the way through the 70s and I never understood one word of what you were singing about!’ So I said to her: ‘Well, I didn’t understand a word of it either!’” (Gales of audience laughter)

I was prepared for all sorts of things, but I never expected Yes to show a sense of, you know, Fun. Yet all the people on stage at Nottingham’s Royal Concert Hall – band and orchestra alike – were clearly having a ball. Bassist Chris Squire - wearing a flouncy black smock over skin-tight lycra leggings tucked into Doc Marten boots – was having more of a ball than most. Every now and again (particularly during Starship Trooper and Ritual), he would start galumphing round the stage, legs akimbo, alternately pulling fearsome “I AM THOR, GOD OF THUNDER!” type poses and cracking into broad “Isn’t this just the best job in the world?” type grins. In a flash of awful clarity, you suddenly saw where New Order’s Hooky stole his best moves.

In stark contrast, at the opposite side of the stage, Steve Howe’s aura was one of professorial detachment and studious concentration (though occasionally he would forget himself and allow a broad toothy grin to spread over his face). With his once much-envied tresses now receding, showing a surprisingly high domed forehead, he seemed to be morphing into an unholy cross between Stephen Hawking and Sven-Goran Eriksson. Midway through the third song of the night, he was already onto his ninth guitar (K was counting). By the end of the show, he had got through thirteen of them. Sometimes, he would have one guitar still strapped to him, but would actually be playing a different guitar in front of that, set up on a stand. His guitar technician, an almost constant presence on stage throughout, must surely be the hardest working roadie in show business.

Meanwhile, Anderson skipped about the stage like the irrepressibly cheerful space pixie he always was, his singing as high and clear as ever. He was only flummoxed once. Yes fans being the obsessives that they are, the real diehards down the front already knew the order of the set. So they were well aware that on some nights, the band weren’t bothering to play Gates Of Delirium (from 1974’s Relayer album) – a complex and challenging work, even by Yes standards, which I find almost impossible to listen to, but which can reduce other grown men to tears (I’ll name no names here…) So, when the appointed time arrived, shouts of “GATES!” immediately started reverberating round the front stalls. One bunch even unfurled a huge black banner, with “GATES OF DELIRIUM” painted in huge letters. Unfortunately, this wasn’t a designated “Gates night”. The orchestra didn’t even have the sheet music with them, so we were told. Anderson had thought they could all get away with it. Big mistake! Howls of protest. One very uncomfortable looking space pixie wringing his hands and squirming with embarrassment, at a loss for words.

This aside, there was, as they say, a lot of love in the room. The audience were mostly men in their forties, reliving their adolescence with unselfconscious glee (and, latterly, gimpy dancing). Their partners were, to a woman, all bearing the same Brave Smile. It was very strange being in the company of people whose lips didn’t automatically curl into a sneer at the very mention of the band’s name. Strange, and curiously liberating. Why, it almost felt like Pride marches in the late eighties!

The band opened with the first song of theirs which I ever heard (aged 12) – Close To The Edge. The experience of actually hearing it being played live in front of me, 27 years after buying the album, was overwhelming. For all of its duration (and it’s a long piece – maybe 20 minutes or so), I was on the brink of tears. I later discovered that I wasn’t the only one. The band played it superbly. The orchestral backing, which seemed so restrictive on their current album (Magnification), worked magnificently well on stage – it was a balanced, integral part of the whole.

I was watching the members of the orchestra closely. Sometimes, when a rock act adopts an orchestra, you can see a very particular expression on their faces. It’s a sort of distant disdain. It says: “My God, the things I have to do to pay the rent...” But not with this orchestra. I honestly think they, uh, dug it. Respect!

Other highlights: And You And I (the orchestra worked beautifully well on this), Ritual (Nous Sommes Du Soleil), and a final, ecstatic Roundabout. In fact, even the new stuff sounded good. In fact, there weren’t really any boring moments at all. And I was completely prepared for boring moments. But this band know how to entertain – and by God, they can play their instruments. Technically, they were stunning. You remembered why you used to like “progressive” rock – because it was an exercise in stretching one’s capabilities to the very limits, and pushing back the boundaries of what a rock band was capable of producing. Is that really so very wrong?

And one other thing, which also struck me when I saw Gong last month. Somehow, the spirit of optimism was still intact and going strong. How the hell did that happen? I’d forgotten how important that sense of optimism was to the genre – of a simple faith in human progress and evolution. Hey, we weren’t to know what was just round the corner: punk, Thatcher, style fascism, the death of the socialist dream, all the rest of it (and if you really want to know what happened, read Jonathan Coe’s superb “The Rotters Club” – all will be explained). We might have been naïve then, but it felt so good to reconnect, just for one night, with something which meant so much at the time, and for which we have spent far too much time apologising.

In the pub after the show, eight of us sat round having the most animated conversation about prog acts we had loved. Gentle Giant! Greenslade! Camel! Focus! Gryphon! And if you must, Rush! (Though there was a major schism over that last one.) At the end of the night, as we were heading off home, someone said “God, we’re sad bastards, aren’t we?” To which I replied: no – it’s the people who shut themselves off to stuff just because it’s unfashionable who are the sad bastards. Not us!

Labels:

· link to this ·

Let's Roll - Neil Young

If you're quick, you can probably still download it from here. Thanks to Dymbel for the link and for forwarding the following text.
A new Neil Young song paying tribute to the passengers on the hijacked United Airlines flight that crashed in Pennsylvania on Sept. 11 has been arriving on desks of rock radio programmers around the country this week with no advance notice or promotional fanfare.

"Let's Roll" was inspired by the words of passenger Todd Beamer, who called a GTE Airfone operator from the plane and told of the passengers' plan to storm the cockpit to overpower the terrorists. As he set the phone down, the 32-year-old Oracle Corp. accounts manager reportedly said, "Let's roll." Moments later, Flight 93 plummeted into the western Pennsylvania countryside, killing all 45 people aboard but foiling the hijackers' presumed plan to strike a target in Washington, D.C.

Young wrote and recorded "Let's Roll" two weeks ago and it was rushed to radio by Reprise Records. "Neil saw an article on Todd Beamer and what happened," Young's manager, Elliot Roberts, said Monday. "He wrote the song on the Tuesday before Thanksgiving and recorded it the very next day with Booker T. & the MG's and Poncho[guitarist Frank Sampedro] of Crazy Horse. I went up there [to Young's Northern California ranch] that Sunday and came down with a copy of it on Monday."

On the record, Young sings over an insistent, dramatic, funk-rock beat:I know I said I love you/I know you know it's true/I've got to put the phone down/And do what we've got to do/One standing in the aisle way/Two more at the door/We've got to get inside there/Before they kill some more/Time is running out/Let's roll

The song premiered on radio the evening Roberts returned to L.A., with an airing by deejay Jim Ladd on KLOS-FM (95.5) before anyone from Reprise even knew the track existed. Two days later, Roberts took a copy to the company's Burbank headquarters to play for label executives.

Phil Costello, senior vice president of promotion, was among the first to hear it there and says it was decided by Roberts and Warner Bros./Reprise Chairman Tom Whalley to get it to radio as quickly as possible.

"Neil just wanted to get it out. We took the CD and started to burn copies here."

A team of secretaries was enlisted to help make the more than 400 copies and print up address labels into the night last Thursday.

The discs, with only the words "Neil Young Let's Roll" written by hand on the surface to identify them, were then packed into envelopes with no cover letter or press release. On Friday, the packages were put in the mail for Monday delivery.

Costello says the record has had positive receptions at key classic-rock stations around the U.S. But Jeff Pollack, a programming consultant for more than 100 stations, says the success of the song will not be measured simply in airplay.

"The song will have a sizable impact on rock stations," Pollack says. "But whether it becomes a hit or not is irrelevant. That's not [Young's] intention. It's simply a salute to heroism and, once again, something from Neil that says, 'Here's how I see it.' That's what makes it so authentic."

Roberts says the song will be on Young's next album, due in February or March, but at this time there are no plans for a commercial release of the single. Young is also making a personal donation to a Beamer family fund.

· link to this ·

So, Buni has started blogging. Welcome to the fold! Turnip Prize indeed. The boy has a future ahead of him, methinks.

· link to this ·