| troubled diva |
|
also found at: flickr
· ILM
· last.fm
· NEP
· popular
· rocktimists
· shaggy blog stories
shared items · singles jukebox · tumblr · twitter · village blog · you're not the only one
My freelance writing can now be found at mikeatkinson.wordpress.com.
Recently: VV Brown, Alabama 3, Just Jack, Phantom Band, Frankmusik, Twilight Sad, Slaid Cleaves, Alesha Dixon, Bellowhead, The Unthanks, Dizzee Rascal.
On Thursday September 17th, I danced on the fourth plinth in Trafalgar Square.
Click here to watch, and here to listen. Saturday, April 03, 2004
Out of time.
I'm off to Birmingham for a Big Night Out. (Hello Chig, and nice to see you blogging again.) The rest of the results will have to wait until Monday. I know, I know, I'm such a slacker.
· link to this
Which decade is Tops for Pops? - the results.
4th place - The 1990s. (27 points)
Most popular: Girls And Boys - Blur. Least popular: Breathe Again - Toni Braxton. Unlike the witless puppets of 2004, at least the charts of 1994 can still be credited with some intelligence. Whatever we might think of the offerings by Tori Amos, Blur and Bruce Springsteen, at least they are all, in their own ways, offering something which hadn't been offered before, and thus stretching the definitions of chart pop. Would that the same could be said for perhaps the most unmourned genre of the 1990s - the power ballad. With Celine Dion mercifully absent, it is left to Toni Braxton and Mariah Carey to fly the flag for ghastly, torpid, air-brushed, over-egged, fake emoting. At the same time, dance music (as represented here by I Like To Move It, Renaissance and Doop) had established itself as a regular feature in the Top 10, with many hits having started their lives in what was then a thriving and expanding club scene. The rapid decline of dance music in the singles charts is perhaps the most surprising development of recent years. But the most prescient of these ten hits has to be Girls And Boys. The glories of the Britpop years were just about to begin. Had our sample been taken from the Top 10s of 1995, 1996 or 1997, I suspect that the 1990s would have placed a lot higher than fourth. Labels: whichdecade04
Which decade is Tops for Pops? - the results.
5th place - The 2000s. (26 points)
Most popular: Toxic - Britney Spears. (Watch the fantastic video for this here.) Least popular: Cha Cha Slide - DJ Caspar. "Tuneless - atonal - a horrbile racket - call this music?" There is an argument which says that the 2000s have, in a sense, scored a victory by finishing last in our poll. After all, aren't grown-ups traditionally meant to hate modern chart pop? It's not made for us. We're not supposed to get it. By shifting its emphasis away from the melodic and towards the rhythmic, 2004 pop has done a fine job of alienating many of us. It is, however, a slender argument. There is another more compelling argument which says: yes, today's pop music really is the worst it has ever been. Marketed to death, with all remaining traces of innocence, rebellion and inventiveness squeezed out of the formula. Too focus-grouped, too demographically targeted, too cynical, too knowing - and with a horrible spiritual vacuum at its core. I suspect that this is the line that most of you will prefer to take. Having listened carefully and repeatedly to all ten tracks in this year's selection, two particular observations stand out. Firstly: that much of this music is not even intended to be concentrated upon. In today's multimedia-saturated culture of immediate gratification, we are losing the ability to concentrate on anything much. Many of the consumers of these songs will hear them as nothing more than backwash - as the backing track to their lives. Thus it is that many of these songs (Dude and Cha Cha Slide particularly come to mind) set out their stalls within the first minute; the rest is merely repetition of those first few simple ideas. Secondly: that modern pop is dripping with lust, more explicitly stated than ever before. While the songs of the 1960s speak of romantic love, exactly half the songs of the 2004 Top Ten (Dude, Red Blooded Woman, Not In Love, Mysterious Girl, Toxic) can be lyrically read as unambiguous expressions of directly erotic intent. It's a commonly heard complaint: that popular culture is becoming alarmingly - some might even say inappropriately - over-sexualised. Where will it all end, we ask ourselves, furrowing our brows in concern. We are becoming our parents. Labels: whichdecade04
Friday, April 02, 2004
Songs you have to hear.
In the current edition of Word magazine, 110 musicians and writers are asked to name one song which, in their opinion, should be heard by absolutely everyone. Ranging from the popular (Aretha Franklin, Bob Dylan, Take That) to the obscure (Pink Grease, Walter Pardon, Alberta Hunter), the results make fascinating reading. (Particularly if you have a couple of hours to spare and a broadband connection to hand.)
This morning, I was wondering which song I would have selected. This afternoon, I discovered it was available on the web as a free, legitimate download. So, here you are. The one song which I think should be listened to by absolutely everyone: The Only Way Is Up, by Otis Clay. If this doesn't set you up for the weekend, then nothing will. This is particularly dedicated to anyone who's going through a bit of a tough patch at present. (Gazes meaningfully in the direction of Belgium.). They don't call me an irrepressibly chirpy little f***ing Pollyanna for nothing, you know. So. Which one song do you think should be listened to by absolutely everyone? Please share your recommendations with the group. If I get enough, then I'll compile a little list. As for the final results of this year's Which Decade Is Tops For Pops? project:
Kinja Beta.
When you read as many blogs as I do, then you need an efficient way to find out whether or not they've been updated. (All that speculative clicking can be such a faff, don't you find?)
In this respect, my favourite tool is the Recently Updated UK Weblogs list. The only problem is that to be included on it, each site owner has to register. Even though this only takes about 10 seconds, a lot of sites don't bother, making the directory a frustratingly partial one. Then there's the UKBlogs Aggregator. It's great - but you have to wade through acres of stuff from sites that you don't read. Then there's Bloglines. It's also great - but it will only pick up posts from sites with RSS feeds. What I've been waiting for is a weblog digest that is: a) international. b) based around my own personal selection of sites. c) not dependant on RSS feeds. d) arranged in a reverse-chronological weblog format, with excerpts from each post. e) a piece of piss to set up and maintain. f) freely available for use by others. Launched in Beta just yesterday, Kinja promises to be all of those things, and has got me quite excited. Except that it doesn't quite work yet. I've added my entire blogroll, plus a few more sites besides, and have been checking the updates on my customised Kinja digest against the the Updated UK Weblogs list. Sadly, Kinja is either lagging way behind, or else it doesn't pick up on the new postings at all. But, hey - it's still Beta. I hope Kinja sorts its problems out soon; if it does, then it will swiftly become my new favourite place on the web. To see how it works, take a look at my personalised Kinja digest.
Software trial.
So far, I'm quite impressed with the usability. Let me know what you think - and in particular, let me know if you spot any broken links. Ta. I trust you enjoyed yesterday's little seasonal diversion. I was actually torn between two ideas - the one you saw, or Rent Boy de Jour: the diary of a high class London masseur-slash-escort-slash model, and his dealings with a couple of piss-elegant middle-aged queens from Nottingham who offered him a position as their live-in house-boy-slash-cottage-gardener. But then I thought: nah, somebody's bound to do a BdJ spoof. You can therefore picture my shrieks of amazed delight when, just after posting at midnight last night, I decided to follow a hunch and check Diamond Geezer, that well-known stickler for punctuality. Geezer de Jour indeed! And so brilliantly conceived and executed, as well. Had I gone with the Rent Boy idea, the ensuing embarrassment would have been akin to two Oscar-nominated actresses turning up for the awards ceremony in the same frock. Or maybe I flatter myself with the conceit. In order to execute yesterday's daring stunt, I was obliged to make a special journey to WH Smith to buy some felt pens - only to discover that they are no longer stocked. For all I know, they might have been extinct for the past 20 years. I suddenly felt very old and very out of touch. Instead, I had to buy a set of hideous "gel pens", in vile non-matching colours, with horrible, scratchy, inconsistent nibs, which coat everything you write in some sort of "glitter" effect. Never have I felt more like an eight-year old girl. I'll probably be getting excited about the Top 40 next. (Oh...) My thanks to Emrys of Crticise.Me.uk, who helpfully passed my scribblings on to someone called The Handwriting Lady. Her graphological analysis makes for alarming reading. Here are some choice excerpts:
Wednesday, March 31, 2004
Trentbeat: The Nottingham Sound! Part One: 1974 to 1993.
Tuesday, March 30, 2004
Media whoredom by proxy.
Which decade is Tops for Pops? - Index of entries.
For ease of access, here's an index of all 10 selections, with the current winner for each day displayed in bold type. Voting remains open until Thursday night.
Monday, March 29, 2004
Which decade is Tops for Pops? (10/10) - 2004 edition.
Finally, after a long and arduous slog, our musical journey reaches its summit, as we prepare to stroll amidst the very peaks of popular song from the past five decades. And what peaks we have in store! There's menace, there's war, there's death, there's destruction... and, to complete the horror, there are novelty euro-dance crazes. I did warn you these were going to be a bit weird, didn't I? Buckle up tight! It's the Number Ones!
1964: Little Children - Billy J. Kramer & the Dakotas. For the past forty years, one song above all others has given my beloved K The Fear, to the point where he is physically incapable of listening to it. Not because it's a particuarly bad record - if pressed, he would admit that it has considerable merit - but because, quite simply, it creeps the living f**k out of him. That record, ladies and gentleman, is Little Children by Billy J. Kramer & the Dakotas - the fourth Liverpudlian act in 1964's top ten, and also the sixth "beat group" to feature in it.1974: Billy Don't Be A Hero - Paper Lace. 1984: 99 Red Balloons - Nena. 1994: Doop - Doop. 2004: Cha Cha Slide - DJ Caspar. Listen to a short medley (about a minute each) of all five songs. So why should a seemingly harmless Merseybeat ballad have caused K such sustained mental anguish? Listening closely for the first time last week, I began to understand why. The track fairly oozes menace, with unspoken threats hanging heavy in the air. You can almost see the bag of sweeties outstretched in one hand, the switchblade concealed in the other. To the tender ears of a four-going-on-five year old such as K, I can well imagine this sounding quite terrifying. With Paper Lace (still the most successful Nottingham band ever, which tells you all you need to know about our local music scene), the nightmare continues, as our second singing drummer tells the terrible tale of heroic, tragic, foolish young Billy and his poor, unheeded, heartbroken fiancée. Once again, we are in ambivalent territory. Is this chicken-in-a-basket variety-club cheese, or a bleak noir masterpiece? An innocuous campfire singalong, or a seething anti-war polemic? What would it sound like if Billy Bragg had recorded it? More to the point: what would it sound like if Nick Cave had recorded it? With Nena's 99 Red Balloons, our terror scales new heights. Again, that ambivalence: is this the nadir of fake plastic schlager-punk, or the apotheosis of cold war paranoia? And more importantly, how ever did that atrocious English language translation slip under the net? In its original German version (99 Luftballons), the words sound great: spiky, crunchy, memorable, even vaguely credible. So why - in the name of God, why - go and make the sodding balloons red? And where the Hell is "99 Decision Street" when it's at home? (Apart from being a place to "worry, worry, super-scurry", of course.) And was "there's something here, from somewhere else" really the best description you could come up with? And couldn't you have at least bothered to make the thing rhyme properly? As a student in West Berlin during much of 1983 and 1984, I came to regard the ubiquitous, inescapable 99 Luftballons with great fondness. As for 99 Red Balloons, I successfully managed to avoid hearing it more than a couple of times at most. The process of assembling this project, and having to stare this appalling version in the face, has trampled over my cherished memories, and has almost succeeded in killing off my affection for the original. Quick, I need cheering up! Let's have some Doop! The first and only instrumental track in this year's selection, Doop is a one-hit-wonder novelty track that has actually worn rather well. It's frisky, it's fun, it's a little bit different, and it conjures up cartoonish images of gurning 1920s flappers doing the Charleston on E - which is no bad thing, right? Would that we could say the same thing about DJ Caspar's one-dimensional, hectoring, Cha Cha Slide. Is he a DJ or a drill instructor? "Criss Cross! Criss Cross! I said f***ing Criss Cross, OKAY? Pay attention, you slackers at the back! Five hops this time! No, five hops, you useless f***ers!" So there we have it: the most sinister of this year's songs, the two daftest and most meaningless, and the only two which describe some sort of narrative. Tough choices, huh? My votes: 1 - Billy J. Kramer & the Dakotas. 2 - Doop. 3 - Paper Lace. 4 - Nena. 5 - DJ Caspar. Over to you. With the 1960s now seven points clear at the top, the real race is now between the remaining four decades, who are bunched up together with only a single point separating them. Like last year, it's going to be another photo finish... Please leave your votes in the comments box. VOTING REMAINS OPEN UNTIL THURSDAY NIGHT FOR ALL TEN SELECTIONS. I'll be announcing the final results on Friday. Running totals so far - Number 2s. 1984: 99 Red Balloons - Nena. (111) 1974: Billy Don't Be A Hero - Paper Lace. (88) 1964: Little Children - Billy J. Kramer & the Dakotas. (81) 1994: Doop - Doop. (80) 2004: Cha Cha Slide - DJ Caspar. (40) Decade scores so far (after 9 days). 1 (1) The 1960s (33) -- Congratulations, and celebrations! 2= (4) The 1990s (26) -- You're gorgeous! I'd do anything for you! 2= (2) The 1970s (26) -- I was defeated! You won the war! 4= (5) The 2000s (25) -- Where is the love? 4= (2) The 1980s (25) -- The only way is up! Labels: whichdecade04
|
Without a doubt, drivel home ·
archives ·
tumblr ·
feed
mikejla-@-btinternet-.-com recently spotted...
![]() ![]() we read...
my mother's memoirs: 1940-1960 Amazon wish list powered by Blogger
© Mike Atkinson 2001-2009. All rights reserved. |